5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law

5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law

Blog Article

Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by legislation." It is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon by the prosecution against the petitioner and his above mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined from the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.

When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in a few context, it truly is actually rather imprecise about whether the 90-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based to the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to your 90-day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

Statutory laws are All those created by legislative bodies, like Congress at both the federal and state levels. Whilst this sort of law strives to shape our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be impossible for any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.

This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mould the relief to make it suitable to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision of the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

only around the ground of miscases remanded & only to the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

This guide offers worthwhile insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case legislation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its unique purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case legislation by setting a whole new precedent of higher authority. This may possibly come about several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his development with the concept of estoppel starting from the High Trees case.

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

She did note that the boy still needed considerable therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Protected with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved of the actions.

A reduce court might not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it's unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. If your court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it might both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of the cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.

Stacy, a tenant in a very duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not supplied her adequate notice before raising her rent, citing a fresh state regulation that needs a minimum of 90 times’ notice. Martin argues that check here The brand new legislation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.